2006 Rover 75 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (175 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (240 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (155 Nm). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Rover 75 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Rover | Chevrolet |
Model | 75 | Aveo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 113 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 155 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 46 L |