2006 Rover 75 vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 134 more horse power than 2012 Honda CR-Z. (122 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda CR-Z.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda CR-Z. (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Rover 75 | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Rover | Honda |
Model | 75 | CR-Z |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 122 HP |
Torque | 245 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2436 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 40 L |