2006 Seat Alhambra vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Seat Alhambra is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Seat Alhambra (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Seat Alhambra should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Seat Alhambra weights approximately 464 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Seat Alhambra (170 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Seat Alhambra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Seat Alhambra | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Seat | Triumph |
Model | Alhambra | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1634 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |