2006 Skoda Octavia vs. 1981 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 2006 Skoda Octavia is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 180 kg more than 1981 Toyota Cressida.
Because 1981 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Skoda Octavia | 1981 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | Skoda | Toyota |
Model | Octavia | Cressida |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.9 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 198 km/hour | 171 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.4 seconds | 13 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |