2006 Smart ForFour vs. 1972 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,332 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Smart ForFour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Smart ForFour (94 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2006 Smart ForFour.

Because 1972 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Smart ForFour (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Smart ForFour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: