2006 Smart ForFour vs. 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass (158 HP) has 95 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForFour. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForFour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 630 kg more than 2006 Smart ForFour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass (203 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart ForFour. (92 Nm). This means 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Smart ForFour | 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Smart | Oldsmobile |
Model | ForFour | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1099 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 92 Nm | 203 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2740 mm |