2006 Smart ForFour vs. 1998 Toyota Chaser
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Toyota Chaser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Toyota Chaser would be higher. At 2,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Toyota Chaser is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Toyota Chaser weights approximately 230 kg more than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Because 1998 Toyota Chaser is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Toyota Chaser. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Smart ForFour | 1998 Toyota Chaser | |
Make | Smart | Toyota |
Model | ForFour | Chaser |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1467 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |