2006 Smart ForFour vs. 2008 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2008 Smart Roadster is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Smart ForFour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Smart ForFour would be higher. At 1,099 cc, 2006 Smart ForFour is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Smart Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Smart Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Smart Roadster (110 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart ForFour. (92 Nm). This means 2008 Smart Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Smart ForFour | 2008 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Smart | Smart |
Model | ForFour | Roadster |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1099 cc | 698 cc |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 92 Nm | 110 Nm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 15.6 seconds | 10.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.4 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 35 L |