2006 Smart ForTwo vs. 1997 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2006 Smart ForTwo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Windstar (200 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForTwo. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Windstar weights approximately 875 kg more than 2006 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Smart ForTwo | 1997 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Smart | Ford |
| Model | ForTwo | Windstar |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1690 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 5120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1920 mm |
