2006 Smart ForTwo vs. 2003 Spyker C8
To start off, 2006 Smart ForTwo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2003 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Spyker C8 weights approximately 535 kg more than 2006 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Smart ForTwo | 2003 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Smart | Spyker |
| Model | ForTwo | C8 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 3999 cc |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 135 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 100 L |
