2006 Smart ForTwo vs. 2011 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2011 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Lincoln MKZ is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Lincoln MKZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Smart ForTwo | 2011 Lincoln MKZ | |
| Make | Smart | Lincoln |
| Model | ForTwo | MKZ |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1443 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2728 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 66 L |
