2006 Smart ForTwo vs. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 1,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet (99 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForTwo. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2006 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Smart ForTwo has automatic transmission and 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet has manual transmission. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Smart ForTwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Smart ForTwo | 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
Make | Smart | Aston Martin |
Model | ForTwo | Cygnet |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.9 L/100km | 4 L/100km |