2006 SsangYong Rexton vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 400 kg more than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 2006 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 SsangYong Rexton | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | SsangYong | Studebaker |
Model | Rexton | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2006 | 1956 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2696 cc | 4735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2980 mm |