2006 SsangYong Rexton vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 SsangYong Rexton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 SsangYong Rexton would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Rexton (163 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2006 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 SsangYong Rexton | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | SsangYong | Ford |
| Model | Rexton | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2696 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2490 mm |
