2006 SsangYong Rexton vs. 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 SsangYong Rexton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 SsangYong Rexton would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,269 HP @ 6075 RPM) has 1151 more horse power than 2006 SsangYong Rexton. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 2006 SsangYong Rexton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 590 kg more than 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero.
Because 2006 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 SsangYong Rexton | 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
| Make | SsangYong | SSC |
| Model | Rexton | Ultimate Aero |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2873 cc | 6350 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 1269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6075 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1090 mm |
