2006 SsangYong Rodius vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 SsangYong Rodius. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 SsangYong Rodius would be higher. At 2,694 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Rodius (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rodius should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 888 kg more than 2010 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 SsangYong Rodius is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rodius will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Rodius (342 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 2. (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 SsangYong Rodius | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | SsangYong | Mazda |
| Model | Rodius | 2 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2694 cc | 1399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 342 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.2 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.4 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 174 km/hour | 160 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.3 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2217 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 45 L |
