2006 SsangYong Stavic vs. 2002 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 SsangYong Rexton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 SsangYong Rexton would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 217 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 SsangYong Rexton (319 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2002 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 SsangYong Stavic | 2002 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | SsangYong | SsangYong |
Model | Stavic | Rexton |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3197 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 84 mm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 70 L |