2006 SsangYong Stavic vs. 2003 Acura CL
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Acura CL would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2003 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 SsangYong Stavic | 2003 Acura CL | |
| Make | SsangYong | Acura |
| Model | Stavic | CL |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3197 cc | 3179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 315 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 65 L |
