2006 SsangYong Stavic vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo S60 (401 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. 2006 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 2004 Volvo S60 has manual transmission. 2004 Volvo S60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 SsangYong Stavic | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | SsangYong | Volvo |
| Model | Stavic | S60 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3197 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 401 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 1950 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 93.2 mm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 70 L |
