2006 SsangYong Stavic vs. 2008 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2008 Volvo XC90 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 SsangYong Stavic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 SsangYong Stavic would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2008 Volvo XC90. (182 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo XC90.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo XC90 (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. 2006 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 2008 Volvo XC90 has manual transmission. 2008 Volvo XC90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 SsangYong Stavic | 2008 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | SsangYong | Volvo |
Model | Stavic | XC90 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3197 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 93.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 17.3:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 70 L |