2006 SsangYong Stavic vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 SsangYong Stavic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 SsangYong Stavic would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano. 2006 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 2012 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2012 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 SsangYong Stavic | 2012 Tata Nano | |
Make | SsangYong | Tata |
Model | Stavic | Nano |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3197 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 37 L |