2006 SsangYong Stavic vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 SsangYong Stavic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 SsangYong Stavic would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (450 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 SsangYong Stavic | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | SsangYong | Jaguar |
| Model | Stavic | XJ |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3197 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 335 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2105 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3032 mm |
