2006 SsangYong Stavic vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 SsangYong Stavic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 SsangYong Stavic would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 SsangYong Stavic | 2013 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | SsangYong | Toyota |
| Model | Stavic | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3197 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 544 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 102 mm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3100 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 100 L |
