2006 Suzuki Aerio vs. 2012 Ford F-150
To start off, 2012 Ford F-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Suzuki Aerio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Suzuki Aerio would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-150 (411 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 2006 Suzuki Aerio. (155 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2006 Suzuki Aerio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1654 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Aerio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-150 (588 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Suzuki Aerio. (206 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Suzuki Aerio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Suzuki Aerio | 2012 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Suzuki | Ford |
Model | Aerio | F-150 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2294 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 411 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 588 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 2729 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5603 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2192 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1994 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3386 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 98 L |