2006 Suzuki Aerio vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Suzuki Aerio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Suzuki Aerio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Suzuki Aerio weights approximately 195 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2006 Suzuki Aerio is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Aerio will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki Aerio (206 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Suzuki Aerio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Suzuki Aerio | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Suzuki | Smart |
Model | Aerio | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 33 L |