2006 Suzuki Reno vs. 1952 Toyota SA
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Toyota SA would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1952 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1952 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Toyota SA weights approximately 105 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Suzuki Reno | 1952 Toyota SA | |
| Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
| Model | Reno | SA |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 126 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2410 mm |
