2006 Suzuki Reno vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2006 Suzuki Reno. (126 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Suzuki Reno. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Suzuki Reno | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Suzuki | Ford |
| Model | Reno | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 126 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4690 mm |
