2006 Suzuki Reno vs. 2002 Ford Lynx
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Lynx would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2002 Ford Lynx. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Lynx weights approximately 45 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Lynx. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Suzuki Reno | 2002 Ford Lynx | |
Make | Suzuki | Ford |
Model | Reno | Lynx |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2620 mm |