2006 Suzuki Reno vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Suzuki Reno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Suzuki Reno would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2006 Suzuki Reno. (126 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 2006 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Suzuki Reno | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Suzuki | Holden |
Model | Reno | Cruze |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2685 mm |