2006 Toyota 4Runner vs. 1980 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 4,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (260 HP) has 190 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Tercel. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Tercel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1133 kg more than 1980 Toyota Tercel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Toyota 4Runner | 1980 Toyota Tercel | |
| Make | Toyota | Toyota |
| Model | 4Runner | Tercel |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4670 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 70 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1953 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2510 mm |
