2006 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2001 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (260 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2001 Rover 75. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2001 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Rover 75 weights approximately 250 kg more than 2006 Toyota 4Runner.
Because 2006 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (415 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Rover 75. (185 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Toyota 4Runner | 2001 Rover 75 | |
Make | Toyota | Rover |
Model | 4Runner | 75 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 415 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2830 mm |