2006 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2012 BMW X3

To start off, 2012 BMW X3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW X3 (300 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2006 Toyota 4Runner. (261 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW X3 weights approximately 705 kg more than 2006 Toyota 4Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (415 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 BMW X3. (406 Nm @ 1200 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 BMW X3.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Toyota 4Runner 2012 BMW X3
Make Toyota BMW
Model 4Runner X3
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4671 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 261 HP 300 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 415 Nm 406 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 1200 RPM
Drive Type 4WD AWD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1210 kg 1915 kg
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 4648 mm
Vehicle Width 1920 mm 1881 mm
Vehicle Height 1810 mm 1675 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2810 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 12.4 L/100km 9 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 14.7 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 87 L 67 L