2006 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2012 Holden Barina
To start off, 2012 Holden Barina is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Barina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (415 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Barina. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Toyota 4Runner | 2012 Holden Barina | |
Make | Toyota | Holden |
Model | 4Runner | Barina |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 415 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1650 mm |