2006 Toyota Camry vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Camry (154 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60.
Because 1946 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Toyota Camry | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Camry | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 2358 cc | 3670 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2850 mm |
