2006 Toyota Camry vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,358 cc, 2006 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Camry (154 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (95 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Camry (217 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (147 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Toyota Camry | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Camry | 140 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2358 cc | 1778 cc |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 95 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.5 mm | 84.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 80 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2620 mm |
