2006 Toyota Camry vs. 1992 Volvo 960
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 2,999 cc, 2006 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Camry (190 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1992 Volvo 960. (187 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1992 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Volvo 960 weights approximately 345 kg more than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Because 1992 Volvo 960 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Volvo 960. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Toyota Camry | 1992 Volvo 960 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Camry | 960 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 1986 cc |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2780 mm |
