2006 Toyota Camry vs. 2011 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 2,999 cc, 2006 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Camry (190 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Epica. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Epica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 280 kg more than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Epica (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Camry. (268 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Toyota Camry | 2011 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
Model | Camry | Epica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 1991 cc |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 268 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 65 L |