2006 Toyota Highlander vs. 1971 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2006 Toyota Highlander is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Highlander (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1971 Datsun 240Z. (151 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1971 Datsun 240Z.
Because 1971 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Highlander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Highlander (301 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Datsun 240Z.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Toyota Highlander | 1971 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Toyota | Datsun |
Model | Highlander | 240Z |
Year Released | 2006 | 1971 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 11 L/100km |