2006 Toyota Highlander vs. 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2006 Toyota Highlander is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Highlander (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Highlander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Highlander (301 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma. (118 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Toyota Highlander | 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Toyota | Mitsubishi |
Model | Highlander | Sigma |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2520 mm |