2006 Toyota Highlander vs. 1998 Volvo C70
To start off, 2006 Toyota Highlander is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Highlander (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1998 Volvo C70. (162 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1998 Volvo C70.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Highlander (301 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Volvo C70. (230 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Toyota Highlander | 1998 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Highlander | C70 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 68 L |