2006 Toyota Highlander vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Toyota Highlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Toyota Highlander would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Highlander (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2010 Mazda BT-50. (141 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 511 kg more than 2006 Toyota Highlander.

Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Toyota Highlander. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (330 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Highlander. (302 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Highlander.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Toyota Highlander 2010 Mazda BT-50
Make Toyota Mazda
Model Highlander BT-50
Year Released 2006 2010
Body Type SUV Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3310 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 215 HP 141 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 302 Nm 330 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 1800 RPM
Drive Type Front 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1355 kg 1866 kg
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.2 L/100km 8.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 70 L