2006 Toyota Highlander vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Toyota Highlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Toyota Highlander would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 155 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Because 2006 Toyota Highlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Cooper. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Highlander (301 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Toyota Highlander | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Toyota | Mini |
Model | Highlander | Cooper |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3723 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 5.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |