2006 Toyota Matrix vs. 1976 Volvo 265
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Volvo 265 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Volvo 265. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Volvo 265 (219 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1976 Volvo 265 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Toyota Matrix | 1976 Volvo 265 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Matrix | 265 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 156 Nm | 219 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2660 mm |
