2006 Toyota Matrix vs. 2010 Renault Espace
To start off, 2010 Renault Espace is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Toyota Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Toyota Matrix would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Renault Espace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Espace (239 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Espace should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Espace weights approximately 445 kg more than 2006 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Renault Espace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Espace (330 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Espace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Toyota Matrix | 2010 Renault Espace | |
Make | Toyota | Renault |
Model | Matrix | Espace |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1784 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 239 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.5 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 15.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 83 L |