2006 Toyota Matrix vs. 2012 Renault Megane
To start off, 2012 Renault Megane is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Toyota Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Toyota Matrix would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2012 Renault Megane. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Megane.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Matrix (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Megane. (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Toyota Matrix | 2012 Renault Megane | |
Make | Toyota | Renault |
Model | Matrix | Megane |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |