2006 Toyota MR2 vs. 2000 Acura EL
To start off, 2006 Toyota MR2 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura EL would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota MR2 (140 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Acura EL. (127 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 2000 Acura EL.
Because 2006 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota MR2 (231 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Acura EL. (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota MR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Toyota MR2 | 2000 Acura EL | |
Make | Toyota | Acura |
Model | MR2 | EL |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2619 mm |