2006 Toyota MR2 vs. 2001 Volkswagen Lupo
To start off, 2006 Toyota MR2 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Volkswagen Lupo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Volkswagen Lupo would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volkswagen Lupo (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2006 Toyota MR2. (140 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volkswagen Lupo should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota MR2.
Because 2006 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Volkswagen Lupo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota MR2 (231 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Volkswagen Lupo. (152 Nm). This means 2006 Toyota MR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Volkswagen Lupo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Toyota MR2 | 2001 Volkswagen Lupo | |
Make | Toyota | Volkswagen |
Model | MR2 | Lupo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 152 Nm |
Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |