2006 Toyota RunX vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2006 Toyota RunX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 846 kg more than 2006 Toyota RunX.
Because 2004 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Toyota RunX | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Toyota | Dodge |
Model | RunX | Dakota |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 209 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 83 L |