2006 Toyota RunX vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Toyota RunX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Toyota RunX would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota RunX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota RunX (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2010 Renault Megane. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RunX should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota RunX (171 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Megane. (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota RunX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Toyota RunX | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Toyota | Renault |
Model | RunX | Megane |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.5 mm | 80.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |