2006 Toyota RunX vs. 2012 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Express is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Toyota RunX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Toyota RunX would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1121 kg more than 2006 Toyota RunX.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Express is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Chevrolet Express. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Toyota RunX | 2012 Chevrolet Express | |
| Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
| Model | RunX | Express |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 195 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2231 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 5692 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 2126 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3429 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 117 L |
